Remember the good old days of Yahoo! Mail and Hotmail, the time we only had a megabyte or two of storage? And then when Google announced Gmail with 1GB of storage, that seemed unbelievable.
Permalink: Apple iCloud VS Windows Live Services VS Google Services
It’s that time of the year again when the next flagship Android phone is released, yet again, to dethrone the current contender. Normally, the attraction to upgrade is based on the feature set of the device. But when you look at the Galaxy S and then Nexus S, there aren’t many benefits in upgrading apart from a few features such as NFC, gyroscope and flash. But the major feature in Nexus S is Android 2.3 aka Gingerbread. This is the latest update to Google’s mobile operating system and now that they’ve tied it with a new Google experience device, you can be rest assured that the next OS update will be released on this device first.
Permalink: To upgrade or not to upgrade: Nexus S vs Samsung Galaxy S Showdown!
On Sunday, BlackBerry revealed their new tablet, the PlayBook, at their Annual Developers Conference. While it looks like beast in terms of specifications, lets take a look at how it will measure up against the competition. Note that by the time PlayBook is available in the market, iPad 2 would probably be out, so we might have revisit this comparison again.
Permalink: Comparison: iPad vs Samsung Galaxy Tab vs BlackBerry PlayBook
In a new video, the guys at Pocket Now have compared Windows Phone 7 to iPhone. This is a closer look at how the iPhone differs from Windows Phone 7. As the video mentions, the home screen layouts are completely different. The iPhone goes for the all about the applications look but the Windows Phone 7’s home screen covers all areas of the phone using Tiles which can show live data.
Permalink: UI Comparison: iPhone vs. Windows Phone 7 [Video]
A video has been posted on YouTube that compares the real world usage performance of iPhone 2G, 3G, 3GS and 4 by putting them side by side and clocking the load times of different apps on them. Spoiler: There isn’t much of a different in the loading times of iPhone 2G and 3G, similarly iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4 don’t have much difference either. Which means, if you have an iPhone 3GS, you don’t need to upgrade to iPhone 4 based on speed alone, unless you want a huge amount of memory for multitasking.
Permalink: iPhone 2G/3G/3GS/4 Speed Comparison Video
Nowadays, the iPad has really flooded the US market and left netbooks in the shadows (as the demand and iPad sales figures show), but there are still a lot of things at which a netbook is good at and some things the iPad is. We’re going to do a little hardware and software comparison and tell you guys which one is perfect for you: an iPad or the trusty old netbook.
Permalink: Guide: iPad vs Netbooks. What to buy?
Let’s face it. The Nexus One has to be compared to the iPhone 3GS, whether you like it or not. Even though Google didn’t hype it as an iPhone killer ( but we bloggers did! ), the superphone is a challenger to the iPhone. Specifications wise, it beats the crap out of the iPhone, which still carries a 3 year old screen with low resolution and size and a relatively ‘boring’, uncustomizable UI and somewhat outdated OS ( no Facebook integration, widgets and the likes), but with more than 100,000 apps, one can easily over look these ‘drawbacks’. On the other hand, the Nexus One has a 1GHz processor, a larger and better display and way better battery life than the iPhone 3GS.
Permalink: iPhone 3GS vs. Nexus One comparison video
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes from ZDNet Hardware 2.0 has done a series of benchmarks, not raw ones with exact numbers, but with ratings as results. He took Windows XP SP3, Vista SP1, 7 Beta 1 build 7000 (32 bit and 64 bit), 7 build 7048 (64 bit) and 7 build 7057 32 bit which is the most recent leaked build. He tested the builds on 2 separate systems with these configurations and took 31 tests in total.
Keep in mind that raw benchmark results aren’t allowed under the Windows 7 EULA. Here are the test results from both systems:
Permalink: Windows 7 build 7057 vs. Vista, XP and older 7 builds
Ed Bott has a good benchmarking review of how Windows 7 handle 512 MB of memory when compared to Windows XP and Windows Vista. I had recently posted about a touchscreen 6000 MHz UMPC with 512 MB running Windows 7 nicely, so it shows that Windows 7 is indeed a step forward in terms of performance on low end systems. Good news for all you netbook advocates out there ( I’m not one of you, sorry ! ), and bad news for all the Linux zealots as they’ve got competition now. Interesting thing about Ed’s benchmarking is that he used the x64 edition of Windows 7 Beta, x86 version of Windows Vista and don’t know which version of Windows XP. To keep it fair, he updated all the operating systems with any critical and recommended updates available for them. No third party software was installed apart from Firefox on Windows XP. All these operating systems were testing in a virtual machine. Here are the memory and disk usage results:
Permalink: Windows XP vs Windows Vista vs Windows 7 using 512 MB
