http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:48:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-1931 Imran Hussain Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:49:32 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-1931 It's a rating system. 1 being the fastest, 6 the slowest. It’s a rating system. 1 being the fastest, 6 the slowest.

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-1929 Awais Imran Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:14:16 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-1929 While yes, I understand how 7 is better, what do those numbers stand for? Seconds? Minutes? Or just some user-based rating system Kingsley came up with? While yes, I understand how 7 is better, what do those numbers stand for? Seconds? Minutes? Or just some user-based rating system Kingsley came up with?

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-1913 Too lazy to upgrade to 7? « OPEN BYTES – cave quid dicis, quando, et cui. Sat, 27 Jun 2009 22:34:00 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-1913 [...] On recent hardware, it outperforms Windows XP. It’s not just a claim, it’s [...] [...] On recent hardware, it outperforms Windows XP. It’s not just a claim, it’s [...]

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-11178 Jose Ramirez Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:33:44 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-11178 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Windows 7 build 7057 vs. Vista, XP and older 7 builds - http://shar.es/7xrn</span></span> Windows 7 build 7057 vs. Vista, XP and older 7 builds – http://shar.es/7xrn

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-1299 ME Sun, 24 May 2009 14:41:07 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-1299 I can tell you right now what's wrong with those benchmarks, the table also claims Vista to be faster.. Win7 may be faster, but a benchmark that claims Vista to be faster than XP wont be the best tool to show it. I can tell you right now what’s wrong with those benchmarks, the table also claims Vista to be faster..
Win7 may be faster, but a benchmark that claims Vista to be faster than XP wont be the best tool to show it.

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-1029 What OS system is better for OC XP or Vista - Page 3 - Overclock.net - Overclocking.net Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:12:20 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-1029 [...] ohhh This article and benchmark is a biatch slapper! http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-...lder-7-builds/ __________________ [...] [...] ohhh This article and benchmark is a biatch slapper! http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-…lder-7-builds/ __________________ [...]

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-636 Imran Hussain Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:39:41 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-636 I guess such issues should be expected when using leaked builds. I guess such issues should be expected when using leaked builds.

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-634 Marc Womack Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:28:22 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-634 Yeah, it is blazing fast.... until you try to access a shared directory from an XP machine. Total failure. I've dug through multiple forums and SevenForums.com seems to have best crew of folks well versed in Win7 and the general consensus is you're screwed if your on 7057. Yeah, it is blazing fast…. until you try to access a shared directory from an XP machine. Total failure. I’ve dug through multiple forums and SevenForums.com seems to have best crew of folks well versed in Win7 and the general consensus is you’re screwed if your on 7057.

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-589 Windows 7 build 7057 Benchmark | Microsoft Windows 7 Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:53:56 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-589 [...] Windows 7 build 7057 vs. Vista, XP and older 7 builds | ithinkdifferrent Microsoft Windows 7 build 7022Wie bekannt geworden ist, arbeitet Microsoft zurzeit verstärkt [...] [...] Windows 7 build 7057 vs. Vista, XP and older 7 builds | ithinkdifferrent Microsoft Windows 7 build 7022Wie bekannt geworden ist, arbeitet Microsoft zurzeit verstärkt [...]

]]> http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/comment-page-1/#comment-588 Windows 7 build 7057, Windows Vista und Windows XP im Vergleichstest Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:49:52 +0000 http://www.ithinkdiff.com/windows-7-build-7057-vs-vista-xp-and-older-7-builds/#comment-588 [...] Windows 7 build 7057 vs. Vista, XP and older 7 builds | ithinkdifferrent Tags: Benchmark, Test, Windows [...] [...] Windows 7 build 7057 vs. Vista, XP and older 7 builds | ithinkdifferrent Tags: Benchmark, Test, Windows [...]

]]>