China had the iPad ages before Apple did, Hmm?

tablet_pc_p88

A company in China claims that its iPad knockoff is actually the original design which has been copied by Apple. The P88 (The Chinese tablet’s name) has been in the Chinese market for about six months. You can recognize it easily, it looks a lot like a big iPhone.

Xiaolong Wu, president of the manufacturing company, was interviewed by a Spanish newspaper El Mundo. He claims that if the iPad comes to China, “We won’t have any choice but to report them because it will affect our sales.”, the charge being a copyright infringement.

Wu says that Apple not only copied the concept of a multi-touch tablet, but it also appears to have the same design of the casing and the screen bezel.

Wu says that the iPad and P88, are completely identical. But the specs like to tell differently. It has a 10.2 inch screen, it doesn’t use multi-touch technology, as it uses resistive touch technology, the P88 uses a hard-drive of 250GB, has a 1.3MP webcam, and an Intel 945GSE chipset, a gig of RAM, and an Ethernet port. Its battery life is as much as 1.5 hours.

I think the whole story is suspicious, and ridiculous. I think it’s a cheap play for publicity.

Now for a Chinese product, you would expect something cheap, it really costs $525. Why would anyone buy the P88 if most of it’s features, if not all, are bad?

About the Author

Eddie is one heck of a technology lover. He likes everything that catches his eye. He first loved technology when he got his GameBoy console!

6 comments

  1. Hmm, let’s see: what would have happened if it was the opposite situation?
    Apple would have sued them instantly!!
    So pls stop being an Apple fanboy.

    1. I just report the news. I read about it, and posted it. Trust me, if it’s anything bad about Apple, I would post it. I am objective on posting news.

  2. Hmm, let’s see: what would have happened if it was the opposite situation?
    Apple would have sued them instantly!!
    So pls stop being an Apple fanboy.

    1. I just report the news. I read about it, and posted it. Trust me, if it’s anything bad about Apple, I would post it. I am objective on posting news.

  3. All right. Only, the sentence “I think the whole story is suspicious, and ridiculous. I think it’s a cheap play for publicity.” made me thinking :P

  4. All right. Only, the sentence “I think the whole story is suspicious, and ridiculous. I think it’s a cheap play for publicity.” made me thinking :P

Leave a comment